Blair REVEALS true nature at CHILCOT
by quill Friday, Jan 29 2010, 9:42pm
international / injustice/law / opinion/analysis

Proven War Criminal, Tony Blair, is presently performing before the Chilcot inquiry -- a non-legal, toothless entity/inquiry designed to placate growing public anger regarding the clearly illegal Iraq invasion and subsequent CIVILIAN HOLOCAUST. A holocaust that was initiated by Blair, Bush and Howard – the coalition of willing criminals AND the nefarious Corporate interests behind them!

Most media reports on the inquiry to date seem designed to support a pre-planned outcome, ‘you’re a naughty boy (psychopath) Tony, but you can go and play now!’ Whereas Blair should have been the first Western leader to FACE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION for his historically recorded CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!

The most underreported aspect of this inquiry so far is Blair’s classic sociopathic behaviour! From his classic narcissism to his grotesque inability to EMPATHISE with MILLIONS of his VICTIMS or indeed APPRECIATE the profound CONSEQUENCES of HIS criminal ACTIONS – the man is clearly as SICK as they come; and I take this opportunity to challenge any professional specialist to counter that observation!

Note (below) the slick methods utilised by the Corporate media to dupe and placate the masses; however, we should never forget that it is pathological personalities like Blair that ruling elites seek out and enlist to do their bidding!

The following piece from the formerly trusted, Guardian, is typical of the mass media coverage. I include the entire article here and highlight examples of subliminal techniques deployed to actually praise, exonerate and hold Blair in high regard, as a crafty, privileged villain above the reach of common people and the LAW: [All emphases and insertions are mine.]

Blair at Chilcot: a well-rehearsed performance
by Michael Billington

What did we expect? [Clearly a ‘kick in the teeth’ introduction designed to immediately disempower!] That Tony Blair would break down in front of the Chilcot inquiry admitting he had taken Britain to war on the basis of flimsy intelligence? That he would beg God's forgiveness for the deaths of more than 100,000 Iraqis? [Highly regarded British medical journal, Lancet, put the figure at over 650,000 and Johns Hopkins assessed it some time later at over 750,000 INNOCENT DEATHS! Who does that journo really work for, I wonder?] That he would guiltily confess that at the famous meeting at Crawford, Texas, he had given George Bush unequivocal support for military action? [The above utilises supreme ‘in plain sight’ arrogance, an old advertising trick!]

None of these things happened, of course. What we got was an event short on drama but long on the now-familiar Blair apologia: a kind of "je ne regrette rien" in which he argued that, whatever the messy aftermath, he was right to take us to war to remove Saddam Hussein.

Just occasionally the panel broke through Blair's impenetrable mask [the point here is, NO MASK IS IMPENETRABLE!] of self-belief. He looked a touch rattled when the notorious Fern Britton interview was mentioned and he seemed slippery and evasive when questioned about Lord Goldsmith's change of heart over the legality of military intervention. But except when being interrogated by the terrier-like Sir Roderic Lyne, Blair gave an assured, well-rehearsed performance. [Praising Blair’s confidence and criminal ability!]

We got all the familiar Blair mannerisms: the thumb and forefinger pressed together to underscore a point, the palms extended outwards to betoken moral certainty in the face of external pressure, even the occasional wry smile as when he claimed: "I was never short of people challenging me." [More unconscious praise for arrogance and criminal ability.]

[Here’s the real clincher or pivotal transmission extolling Blair’s masterly ‘skills’ and profound “lawyerly” confidence. (My arse!)] It was a clever, lawyerly, almost Ciceronian performance in which Blair trotted out all the usual arguments and gave a display of his question-dodging skill. But it would have been much more revealing to see Blair quizzed by the parents, many of them present at the inquiry, of the British soldiers killed in Iraq. Then perhaps he wouldn't have got away quite so easily, as he did here, with murder. [We are TOLD/educated that Blair “got away .. with murder. However, in REALITY Blair and those like him have got away with nothing! They face the wrath and dispensation of the people 24/7.]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/29/tony-blair-iraq-inquiry-billington