Cleaves NEWSWIRE [Cleaves Newswire has been decommissioned but will remain online as a resource and to preserve backlinks; new site here.] Independent Open Publishing
"Peace on earth would mean the end of civilization as we know it" -- Joseph Heller
» Gallery


search comments
advanced search
printable version
PDF version

Great Barrier Reef at Risk
by staff report via baz - AFP Saturday, Jun 2 2012, 2:03am
international / environment / other press

Trust is lost as Oz governments abandon duty of care

Have no doubts regarding which interests Oz governments serve today. Everyone seems to be benefiting from the Oz mining boom except the Australian people! Billions in profits are siphoned off for corporate elites, Transnationals and Banks but precious little goes into necessary services and infrastructure. Substandard Oz health and dental services continue to suffer due to lack of 'available' funds -- a very odd scenario despite the FACT that it is the PEOPLE that legally OWN the nation's natural wealth.


Indeed, the nation is being raped by mining Transnationals, Banks and various other large Corporate concerns. And what is our democratically elected 'representative' government doing to restore social balance -- ASSISTING THE EXPLOITERS and resource RAPISTS, of course!

It''s not enough that Canberra allows the wholesale pillage of our FINITE resources with minimal benefit going to the public, the current lackey PM, Juliar Gillard has, for the express benefit of Bankers and Big Business, BURDENED the public with an environmentally ineffective Carbon TAX that will increase the price of EVERYTHING across the board, thanks, JuLIAR!

To add to the existing horrendous social injury and injustice we now have information that the TOXIC 'fracking' -- coal seam gas -- mania and mining boom will have a devastating impact on our Barrier Reef, a natural wonder of the world and a huge long term tourist income earner for the nation! 'Well done' you unrepresentative political lackeys in Canberra and corporate controlled State governments.

What's more, it was foreigners, UNESCO, that informed Oz of the danger to OUR reef -- which is indicative of where the focus of our thoroughly incompetent, lackey politicians is fixed; a disgusting situation by third world let alone first world standards.

But since Keating's selling of our sovereignty/currency to Wall Street and servile to America, war criminal, Howard, through Rudd and finally to staggeringly inept, reviled Washington doormat, Gillard, the nation has been going BACKWARDS at speed.

So now the nation faces the COST of Oz apathy; say goodbye to our Barrier Reef cos the profit-only-driven Corporations couldn't give a shit, they are having a field day.

After all, what are democratic elections for but to vote LYING, frauds into office that serve minority interests only -- neither the Labor or Liberal parties had any idea of the dangers to our Barrier Reef that mining and fracking (CSG) posed, bloody brilliant!

Report from AFP follows:

Great Barrier Reef heading for danger: UNESCO

SYDNEY — UNESCO on Saturday urged decisive action from Australia to protect the Great Barrier Reef from a gas and mining boom, warning it risked being put on its list of world heritage sites deemed "in danger".

Australia is riding an unprecedented wave of resources investment due to booming demand from Asia, with projects worth Aus$450 billion (US$435 billion) in the pipeline.

The world's largest coral reef is not yet at sufficient risk to be declared in danger but UNESCO said the sheer number and scale of proposals including liquefied natural gas (LNG), tourism and mining projects could threaten it.

Declining water quality and climate change were the major threats and it was "essential to reduce development and other pressures as much as possible to enable an increase in the reef's resilience", UNESCO's World Heritage Committee said.

The committee said it would recommend the reef be put on the "in danger" list if some of the biggest projects went ahead.

A UNESCO mission that toured the reef in March to assess the impacts of an LNG project on Curtis Island said it had found an "unprecedented" development boom in the region with serious conservation risks.

"The outstanding universal value of the property is threatened and decisive action is required to secure its long-term conservation," the committee warned.

"The rapid increase of coastal developments, including ports infrastructure is of significant concern."

Gladstone Harbour -- a coal export hub with huge shipments to Japan, India, South Korea and China -- is undergoing a major expansion requiring dredging works which activists say is harming marine life.

UNESCO said environmental conditions stipulated by the government at Gladstone and Curtis Island, a mammoth LNG project targeting annual production of 12 million tonnes, were not tough enough to protect the reef.

It urged a "highly precautionary" approach toward new coastal and port development in the reef zone until a conservation plan had been mapped.

"Such an approach implies that (Australia) should not permit any new port development or associated infrastructure outside of the existing and long-established major port areas within and adjoining the property," UNESCO said.

© 2012 AFP

Minders prevent (Honeywell) Corporate CEO taking probing questions from journalists -- you've got to see this it to believe it, pure totalitarianism!


show latest comments first   show comment titles only

jump to comment 1

QLD Premier ignores reef concerns
by Stephanie Peatling, Rachel Browne via stele - The Age (Melbourne) Saturday, Jun 2 2012, 10:05am

THE Queensland Premier, Campbell Newman, will not stop development in and around the Great Barrier Reef, despite a United Nations report warning the reef's survival is under threat.

The UN's environment organisation, UNESCO, released a report yesterday that said further development of the reef could threaten its World Heritage status.

The program director for Greenpeace, Ben Pearson, said there were 35 major development applications seeking approval within the next 18 months that would affect the reef. He said the scale and pace of proposed development was out of control.

While he was concerned about the effect of development on the reef, Mr Newman said: ''We are not going to see the economic future of Queensland shut down.''

''We are in the coal business. If you want decent hospitals, schools and police on the beat we all need to understand that,'' he said. ''Very clearly there needs to be a proper strategy, orderly progression of these developments. We shouldn't be building a multitude of new ports and we won't be.''

Much of the UNESCO's concern centres on the coal boom in the Galilee basin in central Queensland.

Extra shipping would be required to meet the needs of nine mines proposed for the area, seven of which would be bigger than any existing mine in the country, according to Greenpeace.

"UNESCO has clearly stated that the Great Barrier Reef is under threat from reckless industrialisation and we need to take action now to safeguard it," Mr Pearson said.

The federal Environment Minister, Tony Burke, acknowledged the Great Barrier Reef was ''at a crossroads''.

"While these issues are complex, we are committed to addressing them through a range of approaches both on land and in the marine environment,'' he said.

The federal and state governments are completing a joint assessment of the impact of proposed developments on the reef.

© 2012 Fairfax Media

[Corporate lackey, Newman, makes short term decision, notwithstanding the fact that the living Reef is far more valuable to Queensland in the long term than aquifer poisoning short term Fracking and other mining projects.

As usual the Corporations have no regard for the long term, preferring instead the quick fix to maintain viability on the stock market ... the entire game is wrong, dead wrong!]

<< back to stories

© 2005-2024 Cleaves Alternative News.
Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial re-use, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere.
Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Cleaves Alternative News.
Disclaimer | Privacy [ text size normal | >> ]