Killing Civilians and the new Barbarism - International Peace/War

I would remind everyone that the principal de-stabilisers of world peace and the leading killers of civilians in the world today are the US, NATO and a host of puppet allies -- Rudd’s Australia being chief among those!

Recently, clueless Kevin Rudd, under U.S. orders, drastically increased military armaments spending for his tiny nation; that action has already triggered an arms race in the region AND has placed every Australian capital city in the NUCLEAR target list of regional powers, bye-bye, racists! [The nation’s precious resources remain safe, stupid!] Spineless servility and shameless cowardice comes at an extremely high price these days, Australia!

As the thinking world is well aware, things are not going well for western terrorist states in Central/South ASIA! It seems everyone learnt from the Balkan experience. Targeting civilians and avoiding legal consequences has resulted in a free-for-all mentality -- the Iraq HOLOCAUST bears testimony to the fact!

Today’s conflicts have seen civilians emerge as the biggest losers -- and YOU imagined ‘it’ wouldn't affect you and yours!

Is anyone in the West able to predict the ‘type,’ or what form the next escalation will take in this extremely asymmetric/unequal world? Of course you can; that blinding flash and black rain is the next devolutionary/retaliatory phase -- America/NATO bear full responsibility for plunging the world into chaos! People fighting for their homelands fight to the bitter end, especially when it is CLEAR that EVERYONE is a target!

The experiment, targeting opponents with the knowledge of increased levels of civilian casualties, proved ‘successful’ in the U.S. supported, Sri Lankan anti-rebel 'campaign!' The world turned a blind eye to the suffering of thousands of civilians; International Courts remained dutifully silent, the UN made the usual timid protestations BUT NO ONE LIFTED A FINGER TO HELP THE INNOCENTS!

So it’s full – civilian killing -- speed ahead in the Swat valley and Afghanistan. Welcome to the new, star-spangled barbarism and the nightmare future of America's 'new world order!'

Now a note to the powers that pay handsomely for goods, services and information rendered – are you listening, Han and Yuri?

This is NOT WWII – what price did Stalin pay for NOT heeding the GOOD ADVICE of his agents in the field? He made the critical mistake of using reason in his attempts to predict the actions of an irrational, mass murdering, beast! TAKE NOTE, comrades and pay special attention to previous advice to DUMP THE DOLLAR – it is YOU who are financing America’s PAID FOR ‘successes’ by not dumping the dollar – you know it, you MUST FACE IT and ACT!

Every US military transport that takes off laden with PALETTES of freshly printed, shrink-wrapped greenbacks to bribe ASIAN warlords and local chieftains is assisted by YOU; especially your FEAR of losing some ‘wealth’ – is it preferable to lose the war (EVERYTHING) instead?

Sacrifices must be made; few MAJOR VICTORIES occurred without MAJOR SACRIFICES! For the last time, DUMP YOUR DOLLAR RESERVES, IMMEDIATELY; cut the life’s blood from the whore that is American war, forever!

America was losing its wars until it decided to PURCHASE its enemies! It has THE PRINTING RIGHTS over the WORLD’S DEFAULT CURRENCY, how convenient! YOU have AMASSED VALUE RIGHTS OVER THAT CURRENCY – IF YOU DO NOT USE THAT VALUE SOON YOU WILL LOSE IT, America is not totally stupid, comrades!

The other decisive SECONDARY option is well known to all parties; SERBS have established themselves in the highest (strategic) positions in every major western nation – they are lining up at the door ready to retaliate for KOSOVO – would you continue to stare them in the mouth?

This time, comrades, those who hesitate are LOST indeed!

Endnote:
Need I remind you that BRIC nations and their allies constitute 80% of the world’s population and control most of the planet’s resources – are you unable to harness that awesome (economic) power? CURRENCY is what YOU MAKE IT!

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States will not end air strikes in Afghanistan as demanded by President Hamid Karzai after two villages were hit by U.S. warplanes last week, White House National Security Advisor James Jones said on Sunday.

Civilian casualties from U.S. air strikes has caused friction between the Afghan government and the United States. Karzai made his demand last week during a visit to Washington in which he met President Barack Obama.

"We're going to take a look at trying to make sure that we correct those things we can correct, but certainly to tie the hands of our commanders and say we're not going to conduct air strikes, it would be imprudent," Jones, a retired U.S. Marine Corps general, told the ABC program "This Week."

Asked what reaction he expected from Karzai, Jones said: "I think he understands that we have to have the full complement of our offensive military power when we need it. ... We can't fight with one hand tied behind our back."

But Jones said the United States took seriously the issue of civilian casualties and would "redouble our efforts to make sure that innocent civilians are not killed."

Speaking on "Fox News Sunday," Army General David Petraeus, who as head of U.S. Central Command oversees military operations in Afghanistan, said he had named a U.S. brigadier general to look at the use of air strikes in Afghanistan.

'UNDERMINE OUR STRATEGIC GOALS'

Petraeus, who said he spoke to Karzai about air strikes, said it was important to ensure "that our tactical actions don't undermine our strategic goals and objectives."

The U.S. military acknowledged on Saturday that the air strikes in western Afghanistan last week that struck crowded homes in two villages in Farah province had killed civilians. Karzai put the death toll at up to 130 people.

If confirmed, it would be the deadliest single incident affecting Afghan civilians since U.S. forces invaded in 2001 and toppled the Taliban government that had harbored the al Qaeda network responsible for the September 11 attacks.

The deaths in Farah inflamed Afghan anger about the impact of air strikes and overshadowed Karzai's meeting with Obama. A joint U.S.-Afghan statement suggested Taliban fighters may have worsened the toll by using civilians as human shields.

"They're using civilians as shields," Jones said. "So we have to take a look at this, make sure that our commanders understand, you know, the subtleties of the situation, the complexity of it, and do the right thing."

Former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, speaking on the CBS program "Face the Nation," also defended air strikes.

"I think we need to do whatever we have to do there to be able to prevail." he said. "Air strikes are an important part of that."

Analysts say Western troops are spread relatively thinly on the ground, making them overly reliant on air support. Karzai has called for greater backing for Afghan institutions and the Afghan security forces to replace bombing raids.

(Editing by John O'Callaghan)

© 2009 Thomson Reuters

The bodies of dozens, perhaps well over a hundred, women, children and men, their corpses blown into bits of human flesh by iron fragmentation bombs dropped by U.S. warplanes in a village in the western province of Farah, illustrates the futility of the Afghan war. We are not delivering democracy or liberation or development. We are delivering massive, sophisticated forms of industrial slaughter. And because we have employed the blunt and horrible instrument of war in a land we know little about and are incapable of reading, we embody the barbarism we claim to be seeking to defeat.

We are morally no different from the psychopaths within the Taliban, who Afghans remember we empowered, funded and armed during the 10-year war with the Soviet Union. Acid thrown a girl’s face or beheadings? Death delivered from the air or fields of shiny cluster bombs? This is the language of war. It is what we speak. It is what those we fight speak.

Afghan survivors carted some two dozen corpses from their villages to the provincial capital in trucks this week to publicly denounce the carnage. Some 2,000 angry Afghans in the streets of the capital chanted “Death to America!” But the grief, fear and finally rage of the bereaved do not touch those who use high-minded virtues to justify slaughter. The death of innocents, they assure us, is the tragic cost of war. It is regrettable, but it happens. It is the price that must be paid. And so, guided by a president who once again has no experience of war and defers to the bull-necked generals and militarists whose careers, power and profits depend on expanded war, we are transformed into monsters.

There will soon be 21,000 additional U.S. soldiers and Marines in Afghanistan in time for the expected surge in summer fighting. There will be more clashes, more airstrikes, more deaths and more despair and anger from those forced to bury their parents, sisters, brothers and children. The grim report of the killings in the airstrike, issued by the International Committee of the Red Cross, which stated that bombs hit civilian houses and noted that an ICRC counterpart in the Red Crescent was among the dead, will become familiar reading in the weeks and months ahead.

We are the best recruiting weapon the Taliban possesses. We have enabled it to rise from the ashes seven years ago to openly control over half the country and carry out daylight attacks in the capital Kabul. And the war we wage is being exported like a virus to Pakistan in the form of drones that bomb Pakistani villages and increased clashes between the inept Pakistani military and a restive internal insurgency.

I spoke in New York City a few days ago with Dr. Juliette Fournot, who lived with her parents in Afghanistan as a teenager, speaks Dari and led teams of French doctors and nurses from Médecins Sans Frontières, or Doctors Without Borders, into Afghanistan during the war with the Soviets. She participated in the opening of clandestine cross-border medical operations missions between 1980 and 1982 and became head of the French humanitarian mission in Afghanistan in 1983. Dr. Fournot established logistical bases in Peshawar and Quetta and organized the dozen cross-border and clandestine permanent missions in the resistance-held areas of Herat, Mazar-i-Sharif, Badakhshan, Paktia, Ghazni and Hazaradjat, through which more than 500 international aid workers rotated.

She is one of the featured characters in a remarkable book called “The Photographer,” produced by photojournalist Didier Lefèvre and graphic novelist Emmanuel Guibert. The book tells the story of a three-month mission in 1986 into Afghanistan led by Dr. Fournot. It is an unflinching look at the cost of war, what bombs, shells and bullets do to human souls and bodies. It exposes, in a way the rhetoric of our politicians and generals do not, the blind destructive fury of war. The French humanitarian group withdrew from Afghanistan in July 2004 after five of its aid workers were assassinated in a clearly marked vehicle.

“The American ground troops are midterm in a history that started roughly in 1984 and 1985 when the State Department decided to assist the Mujahedeen, the resistance fighters, through various programs and military aid. USAID, the humanitarian arm serving political and military purposes, was the seed for having a different kind of interaction with the Afghans,” she told me. “The Afghans were very grateful to receive arms and military equipment from the Americans.”

“But the way USAID distributed its humanitarian assistance was very debatable,” she went on. “It still puzzles me. They gave most of it to the Islamic groups such as the Hezb-e Islami of [Gulbuddin] Hekmatyar. And I think it is possibly because they were more interested in the future stability of Pakistan rather than saving Afghanistan. Afghanistan was probably a good ground to hit and drain the blood from the Soviet Union. I did not see a plan to rebuild or bring peace to Afghanistan. It seemed that Afghanistan was a tool to weaken the Soviet Union. It was mostly left to the Pakistani intelligence services to decide what would be best and how to do it and how by doing so they could strengthen themselves.”

The Pakistanis, Dr. Fournot said, developed a close relationship with Saudi Arabia. The Saudis, like the Americans, flooded the country with money and also exported conservative and often radical Wahhabi clerics. The Americans, aware of the relationship with the Saudis as well as Pakistan’s secret program to build nuclear weapons, looked the other way. Washington sowed, unwittingly, the seeds of destruction in Afghanistan and Pakistan. It trained, armed and empowered the militants who now kill them.

The relationship, she said, bewildered most Afghans, who did not look favorably upon this radical form of Islam. Most Afghans, she said, wondered why American aid went almost exclusively to the Islamic radicals and not to more moderate and secular resistance movements.

“The population wondered why they did not have more credibility with the Americans,” she said. “They could not understand why the aid was stopped in Pakistan and distributed to political parties that had limited reach in Afghanistan. These parties stockpiled arms and started fighting each other. What the people got in the provinces was miniscule and irrelevant. And how did the people see all this? They had great hopes in the beginning and gradually became disappointed, bitter and then felt betrayed. This laid the groundwork for the current suspicion, distrust and disappointment with the U.S. and NATO.”

Dr. Fournot sees the American project in Afghanistan as mirroring that of the doomed Soviet occupation that began in December 1979. A beleaguered Afghan population, brutalized by chaos and violence, desperately hoped for stability and peace. The Soviets, like the Americans, spoke of equality, economic prosperity, development, education, women’s rights and political freedom. But within two years, the ugly face of Soviet domination had unmasked the flowery rhetoric. The Afghans launched their insurgency to drive the Soviets out of the country.

Dr. Fournot fears that years of war have shattered the concept of nationhood. “There is so much personal and mental destruction,” she said. “Over 70 percent of the population has never known anything else but war. Kids do not go to school. War is normality. It gives that adrenaline rush that provides a momentary sense of high, and that is what they live on. And how can you build a nation on that?”

The Pashtuns, she noted, have built an alliance with the Taliban to restore Pashtun power that was lost in the 2001 invasion. The border between Pakistan and Afghanistan is, to the Pashtuns, a meaningless demarcation that was drawn by imperial powers through the middle of their tribal lands. There are 13 million Pashtuns in Afghanistan and another 28 million in Pakistan. The Pashtuns are fighting forces in Islamabad and Kabul they see as seeking to wrest from them their honor and autonomy. They see little difference between the Pakistani military, American troops and the Afghan army.

Islamabad, while it may battle Taliban forces in Swat or the provinces, does not regard the Taliban as a mortal enemy. The enemy is and has always been India. The balance of power with India requires the Pakistani authorities to ensure that any Afghan government is allied with it. This means it cannot push the Pashtuns in the Northwest Frontier Province or in Afghanistan too far. It must keep its channels open. The cat-and-mouse game between the Pakistani authorities and the Pashtuns, which drives Washington to fury, will never end. Islamabad needs the Pashtuns in Pakistan and Afghanistan more than the Pashtuns need them.

The U.S. fuels the bonfires of war. The more troops we send to Afghanistan, the more drones we send on bombing runs over Pakistan, the more airstrikes we carry out, the worse the unraveling will become. We have killed twice as many civilians as the Taliban this year and that number is sure to rise in the coming months.

“I find this term ‘collateral damage’ dehumanizing,” Dr. Fournot said, “as if it is a necessity. People are sacrificed on the altar of an idea. Air power is blind. I know this from having been caught in numerous bombings.”

We are faced with two stark choices. We can withdraw and open negotiations with the Taliban or continue to expand the war until we are driven out. The corrupt and unpopular regimes of Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan and Asif Ali Zardari are impotent allies. The longer they remain tethered to the United States, the weaker they become. And the weaker they become, the louder become the calls for intervention in Pakistan. During the war in Vietnam, we invaded Cambodia to bring stability to the region and cut off rebel sanctuaries and supply routes. This tactic only empowered the Khmer Rouge. We seem poised, in much the same way, to do the same for radical Islamists in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

“If the Americans step up the war in Afghanistan, they will be sucked into Pakistan,” Dr. Fournot warned. “Pakistan is a time bomb waiting to explode. You have a huge population, 170 million people. There is nuclear power. Pakistan is much more dangerous than Afghanistan. War always has its own logic. Once you set foot in war, you do not control it. It sucks you in.”

© 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C.

Topics

Other Press

Cleaves on Disc/Stick