"Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind" -- George Orwell
Download and burn the entire Cleaves site -
including all attachments and pics - to Disc or Stick.
The burn will result in a browsable ready
resource you can access on or offline
anywhere anytime you wish!
Julian Assange of WikiLeaks, is an enigmatic widely known person that can’t seem to stay out of the media since he abandoned his anonymous mode of operation. He is regarded as a hero by some and a dangerous subversive by others yet many remain guarded, perplexed and undecided in their opinion of this eccentric Australian man, nevertheless, he has been given unprecedented Corporate media attention and has forced the world to confront the ‘issue/s’ he raises.
Regardless of which position you take on Assange most would agree that the man is highly intelligent, and therein lies a major integrity problem. Assange responded to a question from Matthew Bell of the Belfast Telegraph, thus: “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.” It is also claimed by author, F. William Engdahl, that Assange believes the Bilderberg Group to be an innocuous gathering of people; however, I cannot verify the authenticity of Engdahl’s claim. Nevertheless, Assange’s stance on 9/11 is enough to cast suspicion and doubt on his personal integrity in the minds of many people across the entire social spectrum.
It is plain that the 'free-fall' collapse of WTC Building 7 and the discovery by Danish physicist, Niels Harrit, of active nano-thermite particles in the dust at ground zero, is cause for alarm and a further (forensic) investigation should be carried out. The government report on 9/11 is to most intelligent investigators, ludicrous; it is characterised by huge omissions of known facts/evidence. How Assange, the ‘subversive’ could possibly ‘toe the government line’ on this event, frankly, does not add up!
Personally, I am reserving my final decision on Assange until such time as it becomes either obvious that the whole charade is a COINTELPRO to IMPOSE CONTROLS on the anarchic Internet, or Mr Assange revises or CLARIFIES his previous statement on 9/11 – the evidence of an inside job (conspiracy) is now overwhelming.
I leave you with this video of an early interview. Whether or not Mr Assange’s wooden and very awkward physical gestures/expressions/movements are the result of nerves or a lack of integrity is difficult to determine, nevertheless, they do indicate someone that is not entirely ‘sure’ of their performance.
Seems odd
by Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall Sunday, Dec 12 2010, 4:50pm
Seems odd to me that there has been nothing in the recent Wikileaks cables regarding the issue many Pakistani commentators feel is the real motivation for the US occupation of their country and Afghanistan: namely intense US competition with their major economic rival (China) over limited Middle East oil and natural gas resources. Nothing about the Chinese-built Gwadar Port in Balochistan. Nothing about CIA support for the Baloch separatist movement. Nothing about the vital energy transit route through Balochistan supplying China with Iranian oil and natural gas. Even with the hundreds of thousands of Wikileaks cables, the official US narrative justifying the war in Pakistan and Afghanistan makes no sense whatsoever.
printable version
PDF version
