Cleaves NEWSWIRE [Cleaves Newswire has been decommissioned but will remain online as a resource and to preserve backlinks; new site here.] Independent Open Publishing
 
"The Truth can only set you Free if it is Known" -- Anon
» Gallery

Search

search comments
advanced search
printable version
PDF version

Oz Internet censorship Minister Conroy faces possible law suit
by Stan Beer via Kismo - iTWire Monday, May 11 2009, 9:04am
national / social/political / other press

Round 1 to iiNet against copyright cops

iiNet has scored a stunning round 1 knock-down against the consortium of movie studios and a TV channel trying to sue it because some of its users illegally download copyrighted movies, with some important charges dropped after the presiding judge ruled they had no merit.

Corporate errand boy, Stephen Conroy
Corporate errand boy, Stephen Conroy

The case brought in the Federal Court against iiNet in November 2008 by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) has rallied the ISP industry behind Australia's third largest ISP as many fear they too could be held responsible for their users' actions.

Today, some will be breathing a sigh of relief because iiNet is no longer accused of directly commiting copyright infringement.

However, AFACT, which is representing a pretty powerful group in Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Disney Enterprises, Inc and the Seven Network, has plenty of ammunition left in it armoury, even though it has to pay iiNet's court costs for the initial charges.

The main part of the case commences next week. That's the part where iiNet has to convince the court that it is not liable for the illegal actions of some of its users.

If the ISP is found to be liable, then the penalties will be severe and would have far reaching consequences for every ISP in Australia including Telstra and Optus.

There is widespread feeling that iiNet in this case has been targeted for a number of reasons.

One reason is that the ISP is large enough to matter but does not have the deep pockets or clout of Telstra or Optus.

Another is that iiNet is unpopular with the current Federal Government because of its very public stoush with Communications Minister Senator Stephen Conroy over the proposed mandatory ISP filter program, which iiNet strongly opposes.

Last month, Senator Conroy caused a near outcry when he publicly commented on the case, casting negative aspersions on iiNet's defence. Some legal experts ventured opinions that iiNet may have a case for suing the Senator for his out of Parliament comments.

However, for now the Senator is out of iiNet's immediate focus as it prepares to do battle with the forces aligned against it in the Federal Court in one of the most far reaching test cases in the Internet's short history.

© 2009 itWire


 
<< back to stories
 

© 2005-2024 Cleaves Alternative News.
Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial re-use, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere.
Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Cleaves Alternative News.
Disclaimer | Privacy [ text size >> ]