Learn from U.S. Failures
by Kingfisher Saturday, Jul 19 2008, 10:47pm
international /
social/political /
commentary
The entire world has a great opportunity to learn from the devastating failures of the USA. America’s major failures include (the lack of) government accountability, disregarding LAW and international convention, economic MISMANAGEMENT and of course DESTRUCTIVE FOREIGN POLICY! The perpetrators and others responsible are well known; rounding them up for trial would be a simple matter.
In the most critical areas of national life America has failed dramatically. So dramatically in fact, Bush’s perverse, inept and criminal policies promise to completely ruin the nation regardless of who wins the next presidency – the damage is just too severe! If the U.S. were a patient it would be on life support in intensive care!
The people and the nation were warned countless times, by countless commentators and analysts to remove CRIMINALS FROM GOVERNMENT AND OTHER POSITIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY before irreparable damage was done. Failure to heed warnings has resulted in the debacle we have today! I refer readers to the double-digit economic growth figures of other nations as a sobering comparison to the U.S. quicksand economy – allied and financially connected nations TAKE NOTE!
Inaction when remedial ACTION was urgently required has resulted in the train wreck that is the USA today. Research all the available figures and verify the FACTS for yourselves; however, for those Americans who continue to suffer from ‘reality aversion’ we recommend the Murdoch media. It should be noted that the current criminally incompetent U.S. administration COULD NOT HAVE SUCCEEDED WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF RUPERT MURDOCH and his media group – criminal charges would also extend to media barons who constantly and CONSCIOUSLY MISLED the public!
The day of reckoning is at hand. It is not in the interests of the free world to gloat or repeat recommendations that have been constantly ignored. However, it is clear that the criminals responsible for bringing down the nation must be dealt with before any REAL positive restoration can occur.
Laissez-faire capitalism is DEAD, killed by its own deregulated, free market system – hanging on to it or attempting to revive it would be the height of folly but that is precisely what Bush and the Corporate sector are attempting to do – good luck, gentlemen!
Regulated and managed economies have not only survived they have BOOMED! The distributed wealth paradigm has proven far superior to the concentrated wealth, now FAILED, model.
The American people require JUSTICE; the nation requires re-construction and the free people of the world require SPECTACLE. We can only oblige by offering the greatest trials in modern history. A formula made in political heaven!
Adhere to the principles enshrined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights; documents that Bush and his cohorts refer to as “pieces of paper!” No person/s or nation anywhere has been able to improve on those principles. They are inspirational and simply magnificent!
Jail the criminals, every last one of them!
We are One.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/20/weekinreview/20goodman.html COMMENTS show latest comments first show comment titles only
jump to comment 1
2
"Architect" of crime -- why is Rove still at large?
by Michael Isikoff via mitch - Newsweek Sunday, Jul 20 2008, 4:45am
Rove avoids subpoena: an empty seat and an exotic getaway.
House Democrats were fuming recently when Karl Rove defied a congressional subpoena and refused to show up at a House Judiciary Committee hearing into whether he meddled in Justice Department prosecutions. Instead of grilling the former White House political chief under oath, the members found themselves talking to an empty chair. What they didn't know is where Rove was that day: on a jet flying to a speaking engagement at Yalta, the historic Black Sea resort in Ukraine. Rove, who generally charges a reported $40,000 per talk, appeared on a premier panel (along with Democratic strategist Bob Shrum) on the upcoming U.S. election at the fifth annual conference of the YES Foundation, a confab of world luminaries bankrolled by billionaire Victor Pinchuk, the Ukrainian steel magnate and son-in-law of the country's former autocratic president, Leonid Kuchma.
Democrats on the judiciary panel were outraged when they heard about Rove's overseas jaunt on the day he'd been ordered to testify. "That's just extremely contemptuous—it shows the disdain that he has for Congress and which he has encouraged in the Bush White House," said Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee. But Robert Luskin, Rove's lawyer, said the criticism was "fatuous" because, before he took off, Rove had been directed by White House counsel Fred Fielding not to show up. The reason: as a former presidential adviser, the White House views anything he might say to the panel as covered by executive privilege. "What was he supposed to do, sit at home with his lights off?" said Luskin. "I understand that people are unhappy that he didn't show up." But the no-show "was not something we concocted so he could make money in Yalta." Rove himself did not respond to a request for comment. But last week in an appearance on Bill O'Reilly's Fox News show, Rove dismissed the Democrats' demand for his testimony: "They want a circus," he said.
The dispute is far from over. Democratic members and aides said they expect judiciary chair Rep. John Conyers to push for a vote holding Rove in contempt of Congress—an act that would likely end up as part of an ongoing court battle over another executive privilege dispute involving White House chief of staff Josh Bolton and former chief counsel Harriet Miers, both of whom also ignored subpoenas involving the U.S. attorney firings. (The White House also last week invoked executive privilege in refusing to turn over to another House panel an FBI interview of Vice President Dick Cheney in the CIA leak case.) Democrats acknowledge they have few good options to enforce their subpoenas. But they hope to vent their frustrations at an upcoming hearing called by Conyers on "the imperial presidency," where they will give Rep. Dennis Kucinich an opportunity to argue his case for President Bush's impeachment. Republicans, for their part, derided the upcoming hearing as a waste of time. This is "merely political theater," said Rep. Lamar Smith, the judiciary panel's ranking Republican.
© 2008 Newsweek, Inc.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/147776
The abuses of the Federal Reserve System
by Richard C Cook via reed - Global Research Wednesday, Jul 23 2008, 9:47am
Louis T. McFadden (1876-1936): An American Hero
Dr. Ron Paul, the Republican candidate for the 2008 presidential nomination, is not the first U.S. politician to point to the abuses of the Federal Reserve System and call for its abolishment. Similar pleas to get rid of the Fed were made by Reps. Wright Patman (1893-1976) and Henry Gonzales (1916-2000), both Democratic congressmen from Texas and chairmen of the House Banking Committee.
Few recall, however, how controversial the Fed was when it was first proposed and then maneuvered through a recessing Congress just before Christmas 1913. Rep. Charles Lindbergh, Sr., R-MN and father of the future aviator, called the Federal Reserve Act “the worst legislative crime of the ages.”
But the strongest opposition came later, during the Great Depression. The source was Rep. Louis T. McFadden, a Republican representative from Pennsylvania who, as a former bank cashier and president, knew the financial system intimately.
McFadden was born in Granville Center , Bradford County , Pennsylvania , on July 25, 1876, just three weeks after the nation celebrated its centennial at the Philadelphia Exposition. He graduated from Warner’s Commercial College in Elmira , New York , and went to work at the First National Bank of Canton , PA , in 1892.
McFadden was elected to Congress in 1920 and served until 1934. Though a Republican, he moved to impeach President Herbert Hoover in 1932 and introduced a resolution to bring conspiracy charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.
He also made a 25-minute speech on the House floor accusing the Federal Reserve of deliberately causing the Depression. At the time, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board was Eugene Meyer, who resigned after Frankin D. Roosevelt was inaugurated as president in 1933 and purchased the Washington Post at a bankruptcy auction.
Later in 1933, McFadden introduced House Resolution No. 158, Articles of Impeachment for the Secretary of the Treasury, two assistant Secretaries of the Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and the officers and directors of its twelve regional banks. This was McFadden’s political swan song. In the election of 1934, he lost his reelection bid to a Democrat by 561 votes.
Let’s fast forward to 2008. We are in the early stages of an economic collapse that Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at the NYU Stern School of Business, calls “the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.”
Once again the Federal Reserve is implicated, this time for having enabled the creation of gigantic investment bubbles in home mortgages, commercial real estate, equity funds, hedge funds, and derivatives that are now bursting. Mayhem is now starting to be sown within the producing economy of working men and women after having wreaked devastation on Wall Street and within the banking industry despite massive Federal Reserve bailouts over the past year.
The chief culprit would appear to be Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, who presided not only over the ongoing subprime mortgage fiasco, but previously over the dot.com bubble of the 1990s. This blew up when the stock market crashed in 2000-2001, obliterating $6 trillion of investor wealth.
The subprime conflagration of the 2000s was ignited by an orgy of application fraud that commenced just after George W. Bush became president. According to former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, the investigation of this fraud by state attorneys-general was blocked by Bush’s Treasury Department.
Perhaps Louis T. McFadden was onto something. After his premature death, his words faded into history as he was derided for being anti-Semitic when he said such things as, “ America has to choose between God and the money changers who have unlawfully taken our gold and lawful money into their possession.” Today he is dismissed, sneeringly, as “one of the heroes of the Federal Reserve conspiracy theorists.” (Edward Flaherty, PublicEye.org)
But maybe McFadden said some things that are still worth listening to. In his June 10, 1932, address on the House floor, he declared, as reported in the Congressional Record:
“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated the Government of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States , has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.”
Remember, this was a former bank president and member of the Republican Party speaking! McFadden added:
“From the Atlantic to the Pacific our country has been ravaged and laid waste by the evil practices of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks and the interests which control them ... This is an era of economic misery, and for the conditions that caused that misery, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks are fully liable.”
Further statements by McFadden in his House speeches may be found at: http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html As we watch today with dismay while the U.S. dollar shrinks in value and foreign investors continue to buy huge quantities of federal government debt, we might recall McFadden’s words from a 1934 speech:
“The Fed Note is essentially unsound. It is the worst currency and the most dangerous that this Country has ever known. When the proponents of the act saw that the Democratic doctrine would not permit them to let the proposed banks issue the new currency as bank notes, they should have stopped at that. They should not have foisted that kind of currency, namely, an asset currency, on the United States Government. They should not have made the Government [liable on the private] debts of individuals and corporations, and, least of all, on the private debts of foreigners.”
Of the twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, or corporations, McFadden said in words that also prefigured the life-and-death stranglehold the Fed has over every aspect of the U.S. economy today:
“The imperial power of elasticity of the public currency is wielded exclusively by the central Corporations owned by the banks [i.e., the regional Federal Reserve Banks.] This is a life and death power over all local banks and all business. It can be used to create or destroy prosperity, to ward off or cause stringencies and panics. By making money artificially scarce, interest rates throughout the Country can be arbitrarily raised and the bank tax on all business and cost of living increased for the profit of the banks owning these regional central banks, and without the slightest benefit to the people. The twelve Corporations together cover and monopolize and use for private gain every dollar of the public currency and all public revenue of the United States . Not a dollar can be put into circulation among the people by their Government, without the consent of and on terms fixed by these twelve private money trusts.”
In language that suited the 1930s but are also prophetic of our own disjointed times, McFadden summarized his outrage by saying:
“Are you going to let these thieves get off scot free? Is there one law for the looter who drives up to the door of the United States Treasury in his limousine and another for the United States Veterans who are sleeping on the floor of a dilapidated house on the outskirts of Washington ?”
McFadden may have paid with his life for his outspokenness. After he lost his congressional seat in 1934, he remained in the public eye as a vigorous opponent of the financial system; that is, until his sudden death on October 3, 1936, of a “dose” of “intestinal flue” after attending a banquet in New York City.
Reporting his death in its October 14 issue, Pelley’s Weekly stated that it had “became known among his intimates that he had suffered two [previous] attacks against his life. The first attack came in the form of two revolver shots fired at him from ambush as he was alighting from a cab in front of one of the Capital hotels. Fortunately both shots missed him, the bullets burying themselves in the structure of the cab.”
Next, 'He became violently ill after partaking of food at a political banquet at Washington . His life was only saved from what was subsequently announced as a poisoning by the presence of a physician friend at the banquet, who at once procured a stomach pump and subjected the congressman to emergency treatment.'
Evidently the third time the assassins succeeded, and the most articulate critic of the Federal Reserve and the financiers’ control of the nation was dead. He was 60 years old.
Author retains copyright
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9642
<< back to stories
|