Gillard grovels with relish in her speech to Congress - International Imperialism

Gillard grovels with relish in her speech to Congress
by snowy Thursday, Mar 10 2011, 9:05am
international / imperialism / commentary

Aside from making Oz a primary nuclear target by allowing America to build large scale, third world type, military bases on our soil, ‘she’ now advocates a new FARM BILL to allow ‘more open trade’ – in other words, for the dumbarses that support her, here comes American MAD COW beef to pollute our local product and be consumed by unwary Aussies.

I imagined it would be impossible to beat the cowardly subservience displayed by Howard and Rudd but Gillard has amazed us all with her grovelling flattery to Congress – her entire speech simply articulated what Americans wanted desperately to hear, but with gusto – it made most true blue Aussie patriots puke.

Gillard effectively surrendered Oz sovereignty to her Washington overlords; soon the disgusting twang of American accents will be heard in all our capital cities, as American military personnel peruse their new colonial acquisition.

Fortunately, Gillard spoke for very few Aussies; her shameless acquiescence and allowances can easily be reversed by a new leader with AUSTRALIA’S BEST INTERESTS AT HEART.

What Gillard failed to realise is that a very good friend does not agree with EVERYTHING, instead a good friend offers helpful, CRITICAL advice, especially with regard to war crimes, torture and gross injustices; to quote a famous American novelist, “I never learned from a man who agreed with me.” If the woman had a shred of integrity she would do Oz a favour and stay over there indefinitely, the yanks can have her.

it seems the Australian prime minister has lost her grip on reality -- her speech was so far removed from today's reality, it is frightening.

Former Lawyer Gillard has no excuses, she either consciously chooses to remain ignorant of the facts or she is more incompetent than the above author indicates.

KABUL - Targeted killings of civilians in Afghanistan doubled last year, the United Nations said on Wednesday, as an expanding insurgency strikes at Western efforts to build up the Afghan government and security forces.

In an annual report, the United Nations said 2010 marked the most lethal year for noncombatants in the nearly decade-old war, with a 15 per cent increase in the number of civilians killed to 2,777 — continuing a steady rise over the past four years.

Insurgents were responsible for 75 per cent of those deaths.

UN Assistant Secretary General for Human Rights, Ivan Simonovic, said the UN rights officials had been "in communication with the Taliban", offering guidance to reduce civilian casualties.

UN officials declined to elaborate on the contacts.

Abductions rose 83 per cent, and violence continued to spread from the south to the north, east and west, the report said. Civilian deaths in the north, in particular, rose 76 per cent.

But the most "alarming" trend, it said, was a 105 per cent increase in the targeted killing of government officials, aid workers and civilians perceived to be supportive of the Afghan government or NATO-led foreign forces.

The tactic threatens to undermine further the handover of responsibility for security to the Afghan government, police and army starting this year, as Washington and its NATO allies seek to draw down their combined 150,000-strong force.

Of 462 assassinations in 2010, half occurred in Taliban strongholds in the south, where the United States says it has made most gains from a 30,000-strong troop surge aimed at turning the tide of the war.

In many parts of Afghanistan, local governors live behind sandbags on U.S. military outposts and government officials rarely travel to the areas they are supposed to run.

"People are afraid to go and vote, people are afraid of being elected, people are afraid of actually participating in civilian society," UN envoy to Afghanistan Staffan de Mistura told a news conference.

The report, issued jointly with the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, said the social and psychological impact of assassinations were "more devastating than a body count would suggest."

Violence Spreading

Civilian assassinations were up 588 per cent and 248 per cent in Helmand and Kandahar provinces respectively, the main strongholds of the Taliban and the focus of a U.S. troop surge.

The report noted a 26 per cent decline in the number of civilian deaths caused by coalition and Afghan forces.

Yet the killing of civilians in NATO operations has re-emerged as a major source of friction between Kabul and its Western backers.

Last week, NATO helicopters gunned down nine Afghan boys collecting firewood, drawing condemnation from Afghan President Hamid Karzai and apologies from President Barack Obama and his top commander in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates repeated the apology on Monday during a visit to assess security progress before Washington starts gradually withdrawing troops in July.

Casualties among women rose 6 per cent in 2010, and among children by 21 per cent, while "the spread and intensity of the conflict meant that more women and children had even less access to essential services such as health care and education".

Suicide attacks and homemade bombs claimed most lives.

Of the 440 deaths attributed to NATO and Afghan forces, 171 were caused by aerial attacks, sharply down on 2009 as a result of tightened rules of engagement.

The report noted a decline in civilian casualties in "night raids" by foreign forces, a tactic ramped up under Petraeus to the anger of Afghans and Karzai's government.

It attributed the drop to stricter regulations, but expressed concern about "consistent implementation" and a "persistent lack of transparency on investigations and accountability".

© 2011 Thomson Reuters

Topics

Other Press

Cleaves on Disc/Stick